In short, no. Christian fundamentalist did not always embrace young earth
creationism.
George Frederick Wright wrote a commentary on evolution in his
work “The Fundamentals.” Many Christians accepted evolution holding to either a
day-age interpretation of Genesis or to a “Gap theory.” Only in the latter half
of the Twentieth Century did creationism gain traction in the United States.
The origin of creationism can by tied to Seventh Day
Adventist founder Ellen G White.
She had a vision that revealed to her that
natural geological phenomenon were created during the global flood of Noah.
This idea was tied closely to the Seventh Day Adventist movement until 1959,
the one-hundredth anniversary of the publication of Darwin’s Origins of
Species. Many Christians did not feel comfortable holding to a Seventh Day
Adventist teaching.
In 1959, however there was a push to make the public more
aware of Evolutionary Theory, as many public schools did not teach much on the
subject. As a result of this push new textbooks were written that
unapologetically taught evolution a central organizing principle in Biology.
This curriculum change leads many conservative Christians of that time to see
this move as an attempt to shove evolution down the throats American of
children.
Prior to this a self-taught amateur geologist, George
McCready Price wrote a series of convincing books that repackaged White’s
vision as science. By the early 1960s Price’s work was updated by Whitcomb and
Morris. So when conservative Christians felt they were having evolution shoved
down their children’s throats Whitcomb and Morris were ready to offer then an
alternative explanation for origins that was both scientific and agreed with a
literal reading of Genesis.
Thus the Creation Science movement was born and began
gaining traction though the 1970s. Along the way they dropped references to the
Bible to make the argument more palatable for teaching in an American public
school classroom. Creationist claims about the nature of fossilization have not
been proven. Many of the arguments that
they make in support of their ideas do not hold up to scientific scrutiny.
No comments:
Post a Comment